Building a World-Class International Education Hub: Hong Kong's Trajectory, Tensions, and Theoretical Frontiers
Keywords:
International education hub, higher education policy, student mobility, global cities, fairness and legitimacy, academic labourAbstract
Hong Kong’s strategic ambition as a Special Administrative Region of China to evolve into a world-leading international education hub sits at the intersection of global higher education trends, urban competitiveness agendas, and complex regional dynamics. This article examines the current conditions, governance challenges, and theoretical implications of this transformation. Moving beyond enrollment metrics and ranking discourses, we conceptualize hub-building as a multi-scalar governance project that requires coherent policy mixes, sustained legitimacy, and robust academic labor foundations. Drawing on theories of policy design, global cities, and organizational justice, the paper outlines a conceptual framework for analyzing Hong Kong’s hub trajectory across five dimensions: global positioning, policy instruments, social legitimacy, human resources, and digital transitions. It further introduces four anchor studies that explore critical tensions in exam mobility fairness, international student policy coherence, multi-actor governance narratives, and academic talent retention. The article concludes by proposing a research agenda that prioritizes comparative, mechanism-oriented scholarship to inform how Hong Kong—and similar hubs—can pursue credible, equitable, and sustainable pathways in an era of geopolitical shifts and digital transformation.
Document Type: Original article
Cited as:
Zhang, Y. L., & Chen, Z. L. (2025). Building a world-class international education hub: Hong Kong’s trajectory, tensions, and theoretical frontiers. Education and Lifelong Development Research, 2(4): 156-165. https://doi.org/10.46690/elder.2025.04.01
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic Press.
Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalization and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(1), 3-25.
Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 290-305.
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO and Boston College Center for International Higher Education.
Bauder, H. (2015). The international mobility of academics: A labour market perspective. International Migration, 53(1), 83-96.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67-90.
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1).
Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (5th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Cheng, Y. C., Cheung, A. C. K., & Yuen, T. W. W. (2011). Development of a regional education hub: The case of Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(5), 474-493.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
England, K. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80-89.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class. HarperBusiness.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). The quality and distribution of teachers under the No Child Left Behind Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 133-150.
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
Hawthorne, L. (2010). How valuable is two step migration? Labour market outcomes for international student migrants to Australia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 19(1), 5-36.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hong Kong’s International Higher Education Hub Ambitions: Policy Address Evolution (2000 to 2025) and Multi Actor Governance Synergy. (2025). Manuscript in preparation.
Hong Kong’s International Student Policy (1997 to Present): Changing Logic, Institutional Characteristics and Development Trend from the Perspective of Policy Tools. (2025). Manuscript in preparation.
Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2007). The tools of government in the digital age (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73-89.
Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534.
Jung, J., Horta, H., Zhang, L., & Postiglione, G. A. (2021). Factors fostering and hindering research collaboration with doctoral students among academics in Hong Kong. Higher Education, 82(3), 519–540.
Knight, J. (2011). Education hubs: A fad, a brand, an innovation? Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(3), 221-240.
Knight, J. (2013). The changing landscape of higher education internationalisation: For better or worse. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(3), 84-90.
Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Routledge.
Lu, J., Xie, L., Chen, Z., & Chen, Z. (2025). Reforming exam mobility: Stakeholder preferences and the problem of perceived fairness in Hong Kong’s inclusive temporary immigrant education policy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Mamiseishvili, K., & Lee, D. (2018). International faculty in higher education: Research and practice. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(1), 15-31.
Marginson, S. (2010). Higher education in the global knowledge economy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6962-6980.
Marginson, S. (2016). The dream is over: The crisis of Clark Kerr’s California idea of higher education. University of California Press.
Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281-309.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55-73.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
Mok, K. H., & Chan, W. W. Y. (2020). International student mobility and internationalisation of higher education in Hong Kong: The case of mainland Chinese students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(3), 315-330.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Musselin, C. (2004). Towards a European academic labour market? Some lessons drawn from empirical studies on academic mobility. Higher Education, 48(1), 55-78.
O'Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State of the art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1-23.
Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2005). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595-628.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
Research on Talent Mobility in the Transformation Process of Boya University: The Case Study of L University in Hong Kong. (2025). Manuscript in preparation.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Routledge.
Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303-326.
Shachar, A. (2006). The race for talent: Highly skilled migrants and competitive immigration regimes. New York University Law Review, 81(1), 148-206.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (Eds.). (2013). Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition. Springer.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 48(1), 5-26.
Tian, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Choosing Hong Kong for postgraduate studies: A systematic analysis of the key determinants influencing intra-Asia mobility among mainland Chinese students. Education and Lifelong Development Research, 1(1), 31-40.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3-4), 165-171.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Zhang, M., Jiang, Q., & Fang, T. (2025). Teacher allocation as a global concern: China’s policy experience over nearly three decades. Education and Lifelong Development Research, 2(3), 114-124.